Is PrioritiseTransaction on the horizon?

+2 votes
Can we expect to see this with the next release?

 

At first I thought it may be a way of dealing with issues arising from sending large amounts of transactions in a bulk insert and prioritizing them. However, I realized quickly that we can do that by prioritising how we send it through in the first place.

The other unformulated concept in my head was around the business of transactions and fees and creating a virtual market place around the pushing of transactions. However, if we were to introduce that, we could, without the chain having the concept.

In our C# wrapper we are building, the call is the only one its category to not pass our unit tests :)
asked Aug 2, 2017 by MaSsv
edited Aug 3, 2017 by MaSsv

1 Answer

+1 vote
 
Best answer
It hasn't been a priority until now because transaction prioritization is less of an issue in permissioned high-throughput blockchains, because all transactions tends to get confirmed in the next block. Can you explain the scenario in which you feel you need this?
answered Aug 2, 2017 by MultiChain
selected Aug 4, 2017 by MaSsv
expanded the question
Thanks, so it's sounds like it's not crucial for your needs overall.
...